Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Nguyen et al v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv07166
Plaintiff:
Phuong T. Nguyen and Phuong T. Nguyen, D.D.S., Inc.
Defendant:
United States of America, North American Title Company, Inc., U.S. Small Business Administration and others
Cross Claimant:
Michael A Flores, I
Cross Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo & Company, Debra Francesconi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Nguyen et al v. Wells Fargo, N.A. et al
as 3:2020cv07991
Plaintiff:
PHUONG T. NGUYEN, D.D.S.,INC doing business as LASER COSMETIC DENTISTRY, Phuong T. Nguyen and Phuong T. Nguyen, D.D.S., Inc. doing business as Laser Cosmetic Dentistry
Defendant:
U.S. Small Business Administration, United States of America, Maria A. Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Shu v. United States of America et al
as 4:2020cv06536
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and United States of America
Plaintiff:
David Shu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
McDaniel v. United States et al
as 4:2018cv06785
Defendant:
Yolo County, City of Davis, City of Sacramento and others
Plaintiff:
Tanya Grace McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arden Army, Inc. et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Arden Army, Inc. and Reidar Arden
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Renowitzky v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv05656
Plaintiff:
Carl Renowitzky
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack Obama, Office of the President of the United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anaeme v. United States of America, et al.
as 3:2012cv01879
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America, Public Storage, Inc., State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
