Cases 121 - 130 of 4,493
Kapila v. Selene Finance LP et al
as 3:2023cv03165
Plaintiff:
VAGISH KAPILA
Defendant:
Selene Finance LP and HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Kaya v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 3:2023cv03021
Plaintiff:
Ayse Kaya
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Greene v. PHH Mortgage Services et al
as 3:2023cv02907
Plaintiff:
FRANCES GREENE
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Services, WESTERN PROGRESSIVE, LLC, c/o ALTISOURCE and Western Progressive, LLC
Granados v. City National Bank et al
as 4:2023cv02948
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Granados
Defendant:
City National Bank and WHARTON NOTE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Baird v. Chase Bank et al
as 5:2023cv02877
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Andrew Baird
Defendant:
Chase Bank and Quality Loan Services Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Vanisi v. Citibank, N.A.
as 4:2023cv02835
Plaintiff:
Sedrick Vanisi
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Boucher v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2023cv03155
Plaintiff:
Daniel Boucher
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Andrews v. Shenzhen Kangside Technology Co. Ltd et al
as 3:2023cv03030
Plaintiff:
DAMON ANDREWS
Defendant:
SHENZHEN KANGSIDE TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD, Anker Technology Corporation, ANKER TECHNOLOGY CO, LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jamison et al v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv02757
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Jamison and Jasper Jamison
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation and Western Progressive LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Lee v. Javaid
as 4:2023cv03267
Plaintiff:
Anita Lee
Defendant:
Sulaman Javaid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
