Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Lily et al v. Jung
as 3:2021cv09907
Plaintiff:
Lily, Sarah, Christopher Marchese and others
Defendant:
Eugene Edward Jung
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FERRARO v. JUUL LABS INC. et al
as 3:2019cv07565
Defendant:
Altria Group Inc., ABC CORPORATION #1-25, Philip Morris USA Inc and others
Plaintiff:
GIOVANNI FERRARO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amy et al v. Curtis
as 4:2019cv02184
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, MYA, VIOLET and others
Defendant:
Randall Steven Curtis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lily et al v. Jones
as 3:2019cv01897
Plaintiff:
Jessica, Jane Doe, Ava and others
Defendant:
Gerard Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lily et al v. Breslin
as 4:2019cv01668
Plaintiff:
Pia, Erika, Mya and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Breslin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baird et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 4:2014cv00009
Plaintiff:
Fred Baird , Barbara Barnwell , Willie Callaway and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roe v. American Databank, LLC
as 3:2013cv03829
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe
Defendant:
American Databank, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Roe et al v. Doe et al
as 3:2009cv00682
Plaintiff:
Richard Roe, Richard Roe, II and Don A. Nelson
Defendant:
John Doe, Mark Cuban, Mark Cuban and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Nabers et al v. SmithKline Beecham
as 4:2008cv02661
Plaintiff:
Randy Nabers, Linda Naquin, Jim D. Niece and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation, SmithKline Beecham Corporation, SmithKline Beecham Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Nabers et al v. SmithKline Beecham
as 3:2008cv02661
Plaintiff:
Randy Nabers, Linda Naquin, Jim D. Niece and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation, SmithKline Beecham Corporation and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
