Cases 81 - 90 of 1,983
Tamaalemalo v. Derr
as 1:2023cv00032
Petitioner:
Marenda K. Tamaalemalo
Respondent:
Warden Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hermanns-Raymond v. Lewis
as 1:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Rocky Hermanns-Raymond
Defendant:
Jermaine Lewis and Maui Police Department
Interested Party:
Litigation Coordinator, State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tong v. Derr
as 1:2022cv00543
Petitioner:
Chun Mei Tong
Respondent:
Warden Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sparrow v. Derr
as 1:2023cv00031
Petitioner:
Kelly Sparrow
Respondent:
Warden Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Orosco v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00081
Petitioner:
Maria Del Rasario Orosco
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00057
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
De Garza vs. Derr
as 1:2022cv00537
Petitioner:
Maria Luquin De Garza
Respondent:
Warden Estelle Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Huihui v. Derr
as 1:2022cv00541
Petitioner:
Kaniu Huihui
Respondent:
Warden Estelle Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
James-Fainga v. Derr
as 1:2023cv00038
Petitioner:
Evalina James-Fainga
Respondent:
Warden Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Salazar-Valenzuela v. Derr
as 1:2022cv00525
Petitioner:
Mercedes Salazar-Valenzuela
Respondent:
Warden Estelle Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
