Miller Act Cases filed in California
Cases 21 - 30 of 884
CAPITOL BUILDERS HARDWARE, INC. v. RAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION
as 5:2023cv05462
Plaintiff: Capitol Builders Hardware, Inc. and United States for the use of Capitol Builders Hardware, Inc.
Defendant: RAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION, THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY and RAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION doing business as Silverstrand Construction, a California corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America v. Globalnet and Associates, LLC, et al
as 5:2023cv02140
Plaintiff: S.R. Bray, LLC, a California limited liability company dba Power Plus! and United States of America for the Use and Benefit of S.R. BRAY, LLC, a California limited liability company doing business as Power Plus!
Petitioner: Defendant The Gray Insurance Company, a Louisiana corporation
Defendant: Globalnet & Associates, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, DLC Electric, Inc., a California corporation, Globalnet and Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
Southern Spear Ironworks, LLC v. Parsons Government Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2023at00852
Plaintiff: Southern Spear Ironworks, LLC
Defendant: Parsons Government Services, Inc., Parsons Government Services International Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
Sierra Construction & Excavation, Inc. v. Endurance Assurance Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01139
Plaintiff: Sierra Construction & Excavation, Inc.
Defendant: Endurance Assurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Access Limited Construction v. CJW Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01124
Plaintiff: Access Limited Construction
Defendant: CJW Construction, Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Does 1 to 25, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Bonds of contractors of public buildings
Type: Contract Miller Act
Pace Supply Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 4:2023cv04044
Plaintiff: Pace Supply Corp.
Defendant: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and W. E. Lyons Construction Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
T.B. Penick & Sons, Inc. v. Swinerton Builders et al
as 4:2023cv03019
Plaintiff: T.B. Penick & Sons, Inc.
Defendant: Swinerton Builders, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Zurich American Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Sierra Construction & Excavation, Inc. v. Endurance Assurance Corporation
as 1:2023at00636
Plaintiff: Sierra Construction & Excavation, Inc.
Defendant: Endurance Assurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc., et al. v. Solpac Construction, Inc., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01050
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. and DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Solpac Construction, Inc. a California Corporation Doing business as Soltek Pacific Construction Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023at00589
Plaintiff: DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. and The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Solpac Construction, Inc. dba Soltek Pacific Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?