Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Schappell v. National City Mortgage, et al.,
as 2:2012cv01479
Plaintiff:
William F Schappell
Defendant:
National City Mortgage, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. a/w PNC Bank NA, Federal National Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edwin Caraang, et al v. PNC Mortgage, et al
as 11-17027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWIN PASCUA CARAANG and EDNA GOROSPE CARAANG
Defendant - Appellee:
PNC MORTGAGE, PNC BANK, N.A. and PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE, NATIONAL CITY BANK, E TRADE BANK and others
Caraang et al v. PNC Mortgage et al
as 1:2010cv00594
Plaintiff:
Edwin Pascua Caraang and Edna Gorospe Caraang
Defendant:
PNC Mortgage, PNC Bank, N.A., PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Letvin et al v. Amera Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00539
Plaintiff:
Dennis B. Letvin
Defendant:
Amera Mortgage Corporation, National City Mortgage Company, National City Real Estate Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Teresa Moore, et al v. National City Mortgage Company, et al
as 10-16339
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERESA J. MOORE and EUGENE F. HERSCHELMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE COMPANY, DBA Commonweath United Mortgage Company, NATIONAL CITY REAL ESTATE SERVICES, LLC, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and others
Teresa Moore, et al v. National City Mortgage Company, et al
as 10-15868
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERESA J. MOORE and EUGENE F. HERSCHELMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE COMPANY, DBA Commonweath United Mortgage Company, NATIONAL CITY REAL ESTATE SERVICES, LLC, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and others
Katz v. Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation et al
as 5:2009cv04866
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Katz
Defendant:
Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation, Accubane Mortgage, Accubane Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
