Cases 51 - 60 of 10,621
Maria Castro v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv04263
Plaintiff:
Maria Castro
Defendant:
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Saunders v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv01933
Plaintiff:
Curtis Saunders
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Jaramillo v. OE Federal Credit Union
as 3:2024cv03065
Plaintiff:
Erica Jaramillo
Defendant:
OE Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Patrick Guest v. Target Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv04210
Plaintiff:
Patrick Guest
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kunda Sagar v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04218
Plaintiff:
KUNDA SAGAR
Defendant:
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. and ALEXANDRA RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Frances Fernandez et al v. Favorite World, LLC
as 8:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
Frances Fernandez and Cecille Nguyen
Defendant:
Favorite World, LLC doing business as Shapermint Erroneously Sued As Favorite World, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Thompson v. The Geo Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00889
Plaintiff:
Sean Thompson
Defendant:
The Geo Group, Inc. and Does 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Amado v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., et al.
as 1:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
Sarah Irene Amado
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and Kacy Lelievre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cicely Martin v. Gjuan Martin
as 2:2024cv02834
Plaintiff:
Cicely Martin
Defendant:
Gjuan Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Julian Lawrence Colberg v. Dallas B. Tanner
as 2:2024cv02557
Plaintiff:
JULIAN LAWRENCE COLBERG
Defendant:
DALLAS B. TANNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
