Cases 91 - 100 of 126
Fabrizius et al v. Schultz et al
as 1:2008cv00114
Plaintiff:
Denice D. Fabrizius and William Fabrizius
Defendant:
Keith R. Schultz, Yellowstone Surgery Center, Does I through X and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Marsh v. United States of America
as 9:2008cv00157
Plaintiff:
Patsy Marsh
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sherman v. United States of America
as 1:2008cv00098
Plaintiff:
Andrew Sherman
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Rutherford v. United States of America
as 4:2008cv00044
Plaintiff:
Gail Rutherford
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lytle v. United States of America
as 1:2008cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jay Lytle
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Adams et al v. United States of America
as 9:2008cv00042
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Adams, John Allen, Diana Allen and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Thomas et al v. United States of America
as 2:2008cv00017
Plaintiff:
William James Thomas, Sr. and Elaine Thomas
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Henderson-Matthews et al v. United States of America
as 9:2007cv00155
Plaintiff:
Betty Kay Henderson-Matthews, Betty Kay Henderson-Matthews, Timothy Matthews and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Hernandez v. United States of America
as 1:2007cv00124
Plaintiff:
Mavis Hernandez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Roudebush et al v. Frank
as 4:2007cv00068
Plaintiff:
Dale Roudebush, Dale Roudebush, Natasha Wikstrom and others
Defendant:
Bradford L. Frank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
