Cases 91 - 100 of 134
Foerstel v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02649
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Synthes, Inc., Does and others
Plaintiff:
Carol N. Foerstel
Henry Hanselman et al v. DePuy, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01454
Plaintiff:
Henry Hanselman and Jill Hanselman
Defendant:
DePuy, Inc., DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Dorothy B. Hummel et al v. DePuy Synthes, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02049
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Synthes, Inc., Does and others
Plaintiff:
Dorothy B. Hummel and K. Harold Hummel
Rebecca J Cowan v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01782
Plaintiff:
Rebecca J. Cowan
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Synthes, Inc., Does and others
David Wilsen et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01282
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Synthes, Inc., Does and others
Plaintiff:
Aileen Wilsen and David A. Wilsen
Nelda Holston et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01122
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Synthes, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nelda Holston and Samuel Holston
John Talley v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01111
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Synthes, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Talley
Joan Cipriani v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01119
Plaintiff:
Joan Cipriani
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Synthes Inc. and others
Carl Van Winkle v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01039
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Synthes, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Van Winkle
Mathew H. Nechin v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00708
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Synthes, Inc., Does and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew H. Nechin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
