Cases 11 - 20 of 3,064
Whiteside v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2024cv02699
Plaintiff:
Kyle T. Whiteside
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dai et al v. SAS Institute Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02537
Plaintiff:
Hanson Dai, Max Chiswick, Adolph Robles and others
Defendant:
SAS Institute Inc., Ideas Inc., Choice Hotels International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Chiuchiarelli et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01895
Plaintiff:
Jennifer B. Chiuchiarelli, April H. Yamaichi, Kiyomi Ishii and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Miller et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv01988
Plaintiff:
Christopher Miller and Angela Boykin
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Cal Prime, Inc. v. Sika AG et al
as 1:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Cal Prime, Inc.
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Schermer v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv01815
Plaintiff:
Jared Schermer
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Dwyer et al v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2024cv01844
Plaintiff:
Richard Dwyer and Aimen Halim
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Andrea Freedlund v. Redfin Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv01561
Plaintiff:
Andrea Freedlund
Defendant:
Redfin Corporation, The National Association of Realtors and THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Collins et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv01796
Plaintiff:
Deborah Collins, Hunter Collins, Henry Morales and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Benton v. Bridgestone Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv02217
Plaintiff:
Cheresse Benton
Defendant:
Bridgestone Corporation, Bridgestone Americas Inc, Continental Aktiengesellschaft and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
