Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Vicente Borja, et al v. Scott Nago, et al
as 22-16742
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICENTE TOPASNA BORJA, EDMUND FREDERICK SCHROEDER, Jr., RAVINDER SINGH NAGI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT T. NAGO, in his official capacity as Chief Election Officer for the Hawaii Office of Elections, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL VOTING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM and others
Kealii Makekau, et al v. State of Hawaii, et al
as 17-16360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEALII MAKEKAU, JOSEPH KENT, YOSHIMASA SEAN MITSUI and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF HAWAII, DAVID Y. IGE, Governor, ROBERT K. LINDSEY, Jr., Chairperson, Board of Trustees, Office of Hawaiian Affairs, in his official capacity and others
Leslie Feldman, et al v. Arizona Sec'y of State's Ofc., et al
as 16-16865
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESLIE FELDMAN, LUZ MAGALLANES, MERCEDEZ HYMES and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERNIE 2016, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
ARIZONA SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE, MICHELE REAGAN, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of Arizona, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
SUZANNE KLAPP, THE ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY, DEBBIE LESKO and others
Voting Rights Defense Project, et al v. Alex Padilla, et al
as 16-16717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VOTING RIGHTS DEFENSE PROJECT and AMERICAN INDEPENDENT PARTY
Plaintiff:
CLARA DAIMS and SUZANNE BUSHNELL
Defendant - Appellee:
ALEX PADILLA, in his official capacity as Secretary of State, TIM DUPUIS, in his official capacity as chief of the Alameda County Registrar of Voters and JOHN ARNTZ, in his official capacity as Director of the San Francisco Department of Elections
Leslie Feldman, et al v. Arizona Secretary of State's O, et al
as 16-16698
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESLIE FELDMAN, LUZ MAGALLANES, MERCEDEZ HYMES and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERNIE 2016, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
ARIZONA SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE, MICHELE REAGAN, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of Arizona, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
THE ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY
Fuller v. Nai Aupuni Directors et al
as 1:2015cv00470
Plaintiff:
Harris M. Fuller, Jr.
Defendant:
Nai Aupuni Directors, James K. Asam, Pauline N. Namu'o and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Keli'i Akina, et al v. State of Hawaii, et al
as 15-17134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELI'I AKINA, KEALII MAKEKAU, JOSEPH KENT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF HAWAII, DAVID Y. IGE, Governor, ROBERT K. LINDSEY, Jr., Chairperson, Board of Trustees, Office of Hawaiian Affairs, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AMERICAN CIVIL RIGHTS UNION, CATO INSTITUTE and others
John Davis, Jr. v. Commonwealth Election Commissi, et al
as 14-16090
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN H. DAVIS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH ELECTION COMMISSION, FRANCES M. SABLAN, Chairperson of Commonwealth Election Commission, ROBERT A. GUERRERO, Executive Director of Commonwealth Election Commission and others
National Council of La Raza, et al v. Ross Miller, et al
as 13-15077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF LA RAZA, LAS VEGAS BRANCH OF THE NAACP, Branch 1111 and RENO-SPARKS BRANCH OF THE NAACP, Branch 1112
Defendant - Appellee:
ROSS MILLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Nevada and MICHAEL WILLDEN, in his official capacity as Director of the Department of Health and Human Services of the State of Nevada
Keith Judd, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 12-57177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH JUDD, ORLY TAITZ, THOMAS G. MACLERAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK OBAMA, in his capacity as a candidate on the ballot for the US President in 2012 election, NATALIE E. TENNANT, in her capacity of West Virginia Secretary of State, DEBRA BOWEN, in her capacity of California Secretary of State and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
