Cases 41 - 49 of 49
County of Plumas v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv01146
Plaintiff:
County of Plumas
Defendant:
Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
County of Sutter v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv01140
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
County of Sutter
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
County of San Diego et al v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv00882
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
County of San Diego and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-16895
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Indiezone, Inc., et al v. Todd Rooke, et al
as 14-16359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INDIEZONE, INC. and EOBUY, LIMITED
Defendant - Appellee:
TODD ROOKE, JOE ROGNESS, PHIL HAZEL and others
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of
as 3:2011cv00969
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Citizens Review Board on Police Practices, Pacific View Motel and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2011cv00655
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Pacific View Motel, Sicuia Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Skilstaf, Inc. v. CVS Caremark Corp., et al
as 10-15338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SKILSTAF, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
CVS CAREMARK CORP., LONGS DRUGS STORES CORPORATION, THE KROGER CO. and others
Skilstaf Inc v. CVS Caremark Corp et al
as 3:2009cv02514
Plaintiff:
Skilstaf Inc
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corp, Longs Drugs Stores Corporation, Kroger Co., The and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
