Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Ruiz et al
as 5:2024cv02669
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Benjamin Jean Ruiz, Tibisay Sanchez, Carloa Andres Garcia individually doing business as La Terraza Grill & Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Theresa Cisneros et al
as 8:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC and G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Theresa Cisneros individually and d/b/a Garcia's South of the Border Cantina & Grill, Alfonso Cisneros individually and d/b/a Garcia's South of The Border Cantina & Grill, Garcia's South of the Border Cantina & Grill, LLC an unknown business entity d/b/a Garcia's South of the Border Cantina & Grill and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Corona et al
as 3:2023cv00507
Defendant:
Angelo Luna individually doing business as Five Suits Brewing also known as Al Toque, Five Suits Brewing Inc. an unknown business entity doing business as Five Suits Brewing also known as Al Toque, Al Toque LLC an unknown business entity doing business as Five Suits Brewing also known as Al Toque and others
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Alfredo Garcia Ramirez et al
as 2:2022cv07804
Plaintiff:
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Alfredo Garcia Ramirez individually doing business as El Bar De Siempre Inc. and El Bar De Siempre Inc. an unknown business entity doing business as El Bar De Siempre Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Garcia Gonzalez
as 2:2022cv03088
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC and G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Enrique Garcia Gonzalez individually and d/b/a Colima Bar and Enrique Garcia Gonzalez individually doing business as Colima Bar
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Aguero-Morales et al
as 3:2020cv02357
Defendant:
Eulalia Aguero-Morales individually doing business as Ma Lupes Restaurant and Manuel Garcia-Nunez individually doing business as Ma Lupes Restaurant
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Aleyda Ramirez et al
as 2:2020cv10040
Defendant:
Ramirez G&G Enterprises, Inc. an unknown business entity d/b/a Tony's Restaurant y Mariscos, Aleyda Ramirez individually and d/b/a Tony's Restaurant y Mariscos, Gerardo Orozco Garcia individually and d/b/a Tony's Restaurant y Mariscos and others
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Miguel Arturo Garcia et al
as 2:2020cv08727
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Jorge Ramirez Jimenez individually and doing business as Sports Harbour, Raymond Rahim Javan individually and doing business as Sports Harbour and Miguel Arturo Garcia individually and doing business as Sports Harbour
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Garcia
as 5:2020cv00899
Defendant:
Emerito Garcia and Emerito Garcia individually and d/b/a Ricos Tacos Anthony Restaurant
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Emerito Garcia
as 5:2020cv00900
Defendant:
Emerito Garcia and Emerito Garcia individually doing business as Ricos Tacos Anthony Restaurant
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC and G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
