Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Woods v. Najera et al
as 2:2023cv00991
Petitioner:
Donte Woods
Respondent:
Najera Gabricla, Attorney General State of Nevada and Gabriela Najera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv00233
Petitioner:
Leonard R Woods
Respondent:
B. Williams and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eleisa v. Wood et al
as 2:2021cv00734
Respondent:
Natalie Wood and Aaron D. Ford
Petitioner:
Carlos Eleisa and Carlos Manuel Eleisa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wood v. Lombardo
as 2:2020cv01944
Petitioner:
Cierre Wood
Respondent:
Sheriff Joe Lombardo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Woods v. State of Nevada
as 2:2020cv01025
Petitioner:
Donte Woods
Respondent:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woods v. State of Nevada
as 3:2020cv00338
Respondent:
Nevada, State of
Petitioner:
Donte Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woods v. Williams et al
as 2:2014cv01982
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian E. Williams, Sr.
Petitioner:
Ian A. Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Williams et al
as 2:2014cv01981
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian E. Williams
Petitioner:
Ian A. Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2013cv01333
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Nevada and State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Nyutu K. Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood v. State Of Nevada et al
as 2:2011cv01667
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and State Of Nevada
Petitioner:
Christopher Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
