Cases 21 - 25 of 25
Hod Carriers Local Union 166 et al v. James Island Plastering, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv01233
Plaintiff:
Hod Carriers Local Union 166, Hod Carriers Local Union 166, Hod Carriers Local Union 166 and others
Defendant:
James Island Plastering, Inc. and Irvin G. James
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Sam Robinson and Ryan O'Brien as Trustees of the HOD 36 and 291 Consolidated Pension Fund; HOD Carriers Loal Union #166, Bay Area Health and Welfare Fund, HOD 36 Money Purchase Penson Plan, v. Gentry Masonry Corporation , Inc.
as 5:2009cv01221
Plaintiff:
Sam Robinson and Ryan O'Brien as Trustees of the HOD 36 and 291 Consolidated Pension Fund; HOD Carriers Loal Union #166, Bay Area Health and Welfare Fund, HOD 36 Money Purchase Penson Plan,
Defendant:
Gentry Masonry Corporation , Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Northern California Glaziers Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Plan et al v. America's Glass Center, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv05451
Plaintiff:
Northern California Glaziers Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Plan, Northern California Glaziers Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Plan, District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
America's Glass Center, Inc. and Nanette Ujdur Conley Robinson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Don Loftin v. AT&T et al
as 2:2007cv05438
Plaintiff:
Don Loftin, Don Loftin and Don Loftin
Defendant:
AT&T, Cingular Wireless, Cingular Wireless and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Notice of Removal - SEC Act
Hod Carriers Local 166 Pension Trust et al v. R E Serrano, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv03477
Plaintiff:
Hod Carriers Local 166 Pension Trust, Hod Carriers Local 166 Pension Trust, Hod Carriers Local 166 Health, Welfare & Vacation Trust and others
Defendant:
R E Serrano, Inc. and Ricky Edward Serrano
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.