Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Neman Brothers and Associates, Inc. v. Trixxi Clothing Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv07572
Defendant:
Boscov's Department Stores, Kohl's Department Stores, DOES 1 through 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Neman Brothers & Associates, Inc. and Neman Brothers and Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101
JCR Fabrics, LLC v. J.B.S., Ltd et al
as 2:2017cv02675
Defendant:
Amazon.com, LLC, Belk, Inc., Boscovs Department Store, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JCR Fabrics, LLC
Unicolors Inc v. Kohls Department Stores Inc et al
as 2:2016cv08519
Defendant:
Does and Kohls Department Stores Inc
Plaintiff:
Unicolors Inc
Urban Textile, Inc. v. Byer California et al
as 2:2016cv01815
Defendant:
Bealls, Inc., Belk, Inc., Boscovs Department Store, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Urban Textile, Inc.
Unicolors, Inc. v. David and Young Group Corp. et al
as 2:2015cv07639
Defendant:
Boscovs Department Store LLC, Contempo, Inc., DSW, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Unicolors, Inc.
Premier Fabrics Inc v. Kohls Department Stores et al
as 2:2015cv02814
Defendant:
Does, Iconix Brand Group Inc and Kohls Department Stores Inc
Plaintiff:
Premier Fabrics Inc
Fabric Selection, Inc. v. Kohls Department Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02149
Defendant:
4 What It's Worth, Inc., Does and Kohls Department Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Fabric Selection, Inc.
Robert Gomez v. Vans Inc et al
as 2:2012cv07158
Defendant:
Does, Kohls Department Stores Inc, VF Outdoors Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Gomez
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. KWDZ Manufacturing, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv02633
Defendant:
Does, KWDZ Manufacturing, LLC, Kohls Department Stores, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc.
LA Printex Industries, Inc. v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv06252
Defendant:
Concord Buying Group, Inc., Does, J.C. Penney Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
LA Printex Industries, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
