Cases 131 - 140 of 12,810
Alfonso Lepe v. Martin J. OMalley
as 5:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Lepe
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jennifer Lynn Retich v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02984
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER LYNN RETICH
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
(SS) Romero v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00588
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Romero
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Cahoon v. O' Malley
as 3:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cahoon
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(SS)Marshall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Elisa Ann Marshall
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Kies v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
Bethany Kies
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Saltalamachia et al v. Martin O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01725
Defendant:
James Saltalamachia, Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley, Martin J. O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Diaz v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Marie Beth Diaz
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jon Mark La Chance v. Martin J O Malley
as 8:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Jon Mark La Chance
Defendant:
Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Papkov v. O'Malley et al
as 3:2024cv01100
Plaintiff:
Aleksey V. Papkov
Defendant:
Martin OMalley, SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF) and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
