Cases 51 - 60 of 12,770
Dacones v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
Gidget Verna Dacones
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7405 IRS: Action for recovery of refunds erroneously made
Menzel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv02400
Plaintiff:
Erik Menzel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Secuity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mike Bowman v. Martin J. O Malley
as 5:2024cv00858
Plaintiff:
Mike Bowman
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Matthew Elliott Lindsay v. Martin J. OMalleySecurity
as 8:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
Matthew Elliott Lindsay
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security and Martin J. OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Alfonso Lepe v. Martin J. OMalley
as 5:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Lepe
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Cahoon v. O' Malley
as 3:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cahoon
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(SS) Romero v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00588
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Romero
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Yamauchi v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01552
Plaintiff:
Heidi Midori Yamauchi
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Keyonna Jacarie Bateman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02943
Plaintiff:
Keyonna Jacarie Bateman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kies v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
Bethany Kies
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
