Cases 101 - 110 of 39,875
Miguel Gonzalo Jimenez v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03857
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL GONZALO JIMENEZ
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sharon Perry v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03781
Plaintiff:
Sharron Perry
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bond v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
Dwight Maurice Bond
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0402 Social Security Benefits
Brooks v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv02687
Plaintiff:
Noah N Brooks
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Alessi v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv02689
Plaintiff:
Frances Alessi
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
(SS) Singh v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
Kuldip Singh
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
(SS)Choyce v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Brionna R Choyce
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
(SS)Fiester v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
Robert Fiester
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Angelica Maria Pena v. Martin OMalley
as 2:2024cv03730
Plaintiff:
Angelica Maria Pena
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Anthony Pagano v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv03731
Petitioner:
Anthony Pagano and Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
