Cases 61 - 70 of 1,555
Stilwell v. Water Resources Commission et al
as 1:2023cv00930
Petitioner:
Glenda Buchanan Stilwell
Respondent:
Water Resources Commission and Water Resources Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Knoll v. Water Resources Commission et al
as 1:2023cv00928
Petitioner:
Grant Knoll
Respondent:
Water Resources Commission and Water Resources Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Knoll v. Water Resources Commission et al
as 1:2023cv00929
Petitioner:
Grant Knoll
Respondent:
Water Resources Commission and Water Resources Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Nisbet v. Bridger
as 3:2023cv00850
Petitioner:
Andrew Charles Nisbet
Respondent:
Spirit Rose Bridger
Bell v. Propm Management Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00847
Plaintiff:
Larry L. Bell, Sr.
Defendant:
Propm Management Inc. and Yui Andy Tang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Munoz v. Farleigh Wada Witt
as 6:2023cv00840
Plaintiff:
Hannah Audra-Veig Munoz
Defendant:
Farleigh Wada Witt
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Linthicum et al v. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission et al
as 1:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
Dennis Linthicum and Anthony Intiso
Defendant:
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, The State of Oregon, The State of California and others
Stephens v. Biden et al
as 3:2023cv00817
Plaintiff:
Shawn Leroy Stephens
Defendant:
USA President Mr. Joseph Biden, USA President Obama, USA President Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Swanson v. United States
as 6:2023cv00810
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Swanson
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
United States of America v. Whitaker
as 3:2023cv00760
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Roger Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
