Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Kelly McGuire v. The Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 8:2010cv01799
Defendant: James L Anderson, Troy L Butzlaff, B Bybee and others
Plaintiff: Kelly McGuire
Friends of Amador County, et al., v. Salazar We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00348
Defendant: Ken Salazar, Secretary of the US Department of Interior, United States Department of Interior and others
Plaintiff: Friends of Amador County, Bea Crabtree and June Geary
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Leonard Hadley v. Scwarzenegger et al
as 2:2010cv00704
Plaintiff: Leonard Hadley
Defendant: E. Martinez, E. Martinez, Arnold Schwarzenegger and others
National Association of Chain, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 09-57051
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHAIN DRUG STORES and NATIONAL COMMUNITY PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee: ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, not individually, but solely in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California, DAVID MAXWELL-JOLLY, not individually, but solely in his official capacity as Secretary of the California Deparment of Health Care Services, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Ind, et al v. State of California, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-16942
Plaintiff - Appellee: CACHIL DEHE BAND OF WINTUN INDIANS OF THE COLUSA INDIAN COMMUNITY, a federally recognized Indian Tribe
Defendant - Appellant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA GAMBLING CONTROL COMMISSION, an agency of the State of California and ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor of the State of California
Plaintiff-intervenor - Appellee: PICAYUNE RANCHERIA OF THE CHUKCHANSI INDIANS, Indian Tribe
Amicus Curiae: SAN PASQUAL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS, CALIFORNIA NATIONS INDIAN GAMING ASSOCIATION, RINCON BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS and others
Lydia Dominguez, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-16359
Plaintiff - Appellee: MIKESHA MARTINEZ, by and through her husband and next friend Carlos Martinez, SIA CHUE YANG, LYDIA DOMINGUEZ, by and through her mother and next friend Lisa Brown and others
Defendant - Appellant: ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor of the State of California, JOHN A. WAGNER, Director of the California Department of Social Services, DAVID MAXWELL-JOLLY, Director of the California Department of Health Care Services and others
Defendant: FRESNO COUNTY and FRESNO COUNTY IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES PUBLIC AUTHORITY
Martinez et al v. Schwarzenegger et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv02306
Plaintiff: Mikesha Martinez, Mikesha Martinez, Mikesha Martinez and others
Defendant: Arnold Schwarzenegger, John A. Wagner, David Maxwell-Jolly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Type: Other Statutes None
Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians v. Arnold Schwarzenegger et al
as 5:2008cv01753
Plaintiff: Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians, Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians and Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians
Defendant: Arnold Schwarzenegger and Edmund G Brown, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Donovant Grant v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2008cv02354
Plaintiff: Donovant Grant
Defendant: Commonwealth of Virginia, Timothy Kain, The Virginia Department of Social Servicesf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Fort Indepedence Indian Community v. State of California et al
as 2:2008at00222
Plaintiff: Fort Indepedence Indian Community and Fort Indepedence Indian Community
Defendant: State of California, Attorney General for the State of California and Arnold Schwarzenegger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362 Indian Tribal Controversy

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?