Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
In the Matter of the Application of Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
as 3:2024mc80070
Petitioner: Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
Respondent: Yahoo Inc.
EVOX Productions, LLC v. Automattic Inc. et al
as 3:2023mc80298
In Re: Automattic Inc.
Plaintiff: EVOX Productions, LLC
Defendant: Yahoo Inc.
Oliver v. EHM Productions, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv02671
Plaintiff: Anthony Oliver
Defendant: EHM Productions, Inc., Aabaco Small Business, L.L.C., Dotdash Media, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Suraju et al v. Yahoo!, Inc. et al
as 3:2022mc80072
Plaintiff: Olanrewaju Suraju and The Human and Environmental Development Agenda
Defendant: Yahoo!, Inc. and J.P. Morgan Chase, Inc.
In re ex parte Application of Dr. Andr von Moos,
as 3:2021mc80258
In Re: Dr. Andre von Moos
Defendant: In Re
Not Classified By Court: Google LLC and Yahoo Inc.
Rosenow v. Facebook, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv01297
Defendant: Yahoo, Inc. and Facebook, Inc.
Plaintiff: Carsten Rosenow
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2707
Hartline v. Yahoo Inc.
as 5:2016cv07246
Defendant: Yahoo Inc.
Plaintiff: James Hartline
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Sventek v. Yahoo!, Inc.
as 3:2016cv05463
Plaintiff: Maria Sventek
Defendant: Yahoo!, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PPG Industries, Inc. v. Jiangsu Tie Mao Glass Co., Ltd et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016mc80161
Plaintiff: PPG Industries, Inc.
Defendant: Jiangsu Tie Mao Glass Co., Ltd, Benhua Wu and Mei Zhang
Respondent: Yahoo! Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Cheap Stuff, Inc. et al v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv03535
Plaintiff: Avi N. Bibi and Cheap Stuff, Inc.
Defendant: Michael Brous, Does, Microsoft Corporation and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?