Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Owda Darabuawad et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Owda Darabuawad and All Thaer
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Secretary ALEJANDRO J. MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Colvin & Son, LLC et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 3:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
Colvin & Son, LLC and Stone Cabin Ranch, LLC
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, in her official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, Tracy Stone-Manning in her official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Land Management, Jon Raby in his official capacity as the Nevada State Director of the Bureau of Land Management and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Francis Flores Faustino v. Irene Martin, et al
as 23-55792
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANCIS JOSEPH FLORES FAUSTINO
Defendant / Appellee:
IRENE MARTIN, San Bernardino Field Office District Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Yujia Pan et al v. District Director, Los Angeles Field Office, United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2023cv04941
Plaintiff:
Yujia Pan and Yuhang Hu
Defendant:
District Director, Los Angeles Field Office, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Reno-Sparks Indian Colony, et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 23-15780
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY, SUMMIT LAKE PAIUTE TRIBE and BURNS PAIUTE TRIBE
Defendant / Appellee:
DEB HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior, ANNE-MARIE SHARKEY, Acting Director of tje BLM Winnemucca District Office and KATHLEEN REHBERG, Field Manager of the BLM Winnemucca District Humboldt River Field Office
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
LITHIUM NEVADA CORP.
Colvin & Son, LLC v. Deb Haaland, in her official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior et al
as 3:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Colvin & Son, LLC
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, in her official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, Tracy Stone-Manning in her official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Land Management, Jon Raby in his official capacity as the Nevada State Director of the Bureau of Land Management and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Not Used
as 3:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Reno-Sparks Indian Colony and Burns Paiute Tribe
Defendant:
Summit Lake Paiute Tribe, Secretary Deb Haaland, Acting Director Anne-Marie Sharkey and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Reno-Sparks Indian Colony et al v. Haaland et al
as 3:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Reno-Sparks Indian Colony, Summit Lake Paiute Tribe and Burns Paiute Tribe
Defendant:
Secretary Deb Haaland, Acting Director Anne-Marie Sharkey, Field Manager Kathleen Rehberg and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Lithium Nevada Corp.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Wesam Ibrahim et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2023cv01085
Plaintiff:
Wesam Ibrahim and Maria Ibrahim
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Mohamed Belghasa Om Gharisia et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2022cv07813
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Belghasa Om Gharisia
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
