Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Kathy Cook v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
as 2:2010cv08870
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC
Plaintiff:
Kathy Cook
In re Apple IPhone 4 Products Liability Litigation
as 5:2010md02188
Plaintiff:
Stacy Milrot , A. Todd Mayo , David Popik and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. , AT&T Inc. and AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ben Kaplan v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 2:2010cv03594
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC, Asurion Mobile Applications Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Ben Kaplan
Unknown:
Joseph K Wright, III
Wright v. AT&T Mobility, LLC.
as 3:2010cv00533
Plaintiff:
Audrey Wright
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
John Simon et al v. AT&T Mobility, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00791
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC and Does
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jacobs, John Simon and Karl Simonsen
Sipple v. AT&T, INC. et al
as 3:2010cv00184
Defendant:
AT&T, INC. and AT&T Mobility, LLC.
Plaintiff:
Donald Sipple
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DICKERSON v. APPLE COMPUTER, INC. et al
as 5:2009cv03577
Plaintiff:
DAMONE DICKERSON and DAMONE DICKERSON
Defendant:
Apple Computer, Inc., Apple Computer, Inc., Apple Computer, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Payne et al v. Apple Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv03353
Plaintiff:
Alyce R Payne, William French, Karen Michaels and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Koschitzki v. Apple Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv03321
Plaintiff:
Avi Koschitzki, Avi Koschitzki and Avi Koschitzki
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Apple Inc., Apple Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Gonzalez et al v. Apple Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv03278
Plaintiff:
Onel Gonzalez, Onel Gonzalez, Ron J. Brayteson and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
