Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Maren Equipment Leasing et al v. DHL Express USA
as 2:2012cv08244
Defendant:
DHL Express USA
Plaintiff:
Maren Equipment Leasing, Elliot Mason and Gary E. Smith
Fisher v. Biozone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv03716
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fisher
Defendant:
Biozone Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Elliot Maza, Brauser Honig Frost Group and others
Petitioner:
Aphena Pharma Solutions - Maryland LLC f/k/a Celeste Contract Packaging, LLC
Interested Party:
CoCrystal Pharma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Alan D. Bird v. William W. Smith, Jr., et al
as 8:2011cv01871
Plaintiff:
Alan D Bird
Defendant:
Thomas G Campbell, Robert Elliot, Samuel Gulko and others
Elliot Lander v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 2:2011cv09975
Plaintiff:
Elliot Lander
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Arrowood Indemnity Company v. Glenn Beckner
as 10-15144
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ARROWOOD INDEMNITY COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
GLENN ELLIOT BECKNER
Daniel Balsam v. Tucows Inc., et al
as 09-17625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL L. BALSAM, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
TUCOWS INC., a Pennsylvania corporation, TUCOWS CORP, a Mississippi corporation, ELLIOT NOSS, an individual and others
Balsam v. Tucows Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv03585
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Balsam and Daniel L. Balsam
Defendant:
Tucows Inc., Tucows Inc., Tucows Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Balsam v. Tucows Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv03585
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Balsam and Daniel L. Balsam
Defendant:
Tucows Inc., Tucows Inc., Tucows Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Arrowood Indemnity Company v. Beckner
as 3:2009cv00035
Plaintiff:
Arrowood Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Glenn Elliot Beckner
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
