Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Roek Construction, Inc. v. Atlantic Marine Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2012at01586
Plaintiff:
Roek Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Atlantic Marine Construction Company, Inc., The Hanover Insurance Group and The Hanover Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Roek Construction, Inc. v. Atlantic Marine Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02991
Plaintiff:
Roek Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Atlantic Marine Construction Company, Inc., The Hanover Insurance Group and The Hanover Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Hanover Insurance Company v. CV Supply, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02645
Plaintiff:
Hanover Insurance Company
Defendant:
CV Supply, Inc. and Pacific Coast Building Products, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Hanover Insurance Company v. CPG Foods LLC et al
as 2:2012cv08473
Defendant:
Antonio Diaz Aguilera, Jesus Diaz Aguilera, CPG Foods LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Hanover Insurance Company
The Hanover Insurance Company et al v. G & J Transportation et al
as 1:2012at00388
Defendant:
G & J Transportation and Joseph Garza
Plaintiff:
The Hanover Insurance Company and Coastal Carriers Truck Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Trenches Inc et al v. Hanover Insurance Company et al
as 8:2012cv00627
Defendant:
Does and Hanover Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Dimitri Maraletos, Jeannette Maraletos, Ginger Toschiaddi and others
The Hanover Insurance Company v. C V Supply, Inc., et al
as 2:2012cv00355
Plaintiff:
The Hanover Insurance Company
Defendant:
C V Supply, Inc. and Pacific Coast Building Supply, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Hanover Insurance Company v. C V Supply, Inc., et al
as 2:2012at00173
Plaintiff:
The Hanover Insurance Company
Defendant:
C V Supply, Inc. and Pacific Coast Building Supply, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
