Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Aramid Entertainment Fund Limited v. David Bergstein
as 2:2013cv01952
Plaintiff:
Aramid Entertainment Fund Limited
Defendant:
David Bergstein
Wimbledon Financing Master, et al v. David Molner, et al
as 12-56328
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WIMBLEDON FINANCING MASTER FUND, LTD, a Cayman Islands company and STILLWATER MARKET NEUTRAL FUND III SPC, a Cayman Islands company
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID MOLNER, an individual, SCREEN CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL CORP., Erroneously Sued As Screen Capital International Inc, a Delaware Corporation and ARAMID CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLP, a United Kingdom limited liability partnership
Defendant:
ARAMID ENTERTAINMENT FUND LIMITED
Wimbledon Financing Master Fund Ltd et al v. David Molner et al
as 2:2011cv07695
Defendant:
Thomas Adamek, Aramid Capital Partners LLP, Aramid Entertainment Fund Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Stillwater Market Neutral Fund III SPC and Wimbledon Financing Master Fund Ltd
Aramid Entertainment Fund Limited v. Library Asset Acquisition Company Ltd
as 2:2010cv02258
Plaintiff:
Aramid Entertainment Fund Limited
Defendant:
Library Asset Acquisition Company Ltd
Aramid Entertainment Fund Limited et al v. David Bergstein et al
as 2:2010cv01881
Plaintiff:
Aramid Entertainment Fund Limited and Cayman Film Holdings Limited
Defendant:
David Bergstein and Ronald Tutor
Aramid Entertainment B.V. et al v. Bontempo Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv01882
Plaintiff:
Aramid Entertainment B.V., Aramid Entertainment Fund Limited and Cayman Film Holdings Limited
Defendant:
David Bergstein, Bontempo Holdings, LLC, Bontempo Productions, LLC and others
Aramid Entertainment Fund Limited v. John Flynn et al
as 2:2009cv01505
Plaintiff:
Aramid Entertainment Fund Limited and Aramid Entertainment Fund Limited
Defendant:
John Flynn, John Flynn, Ring Productions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
