Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Williams et al v. HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, a California Corporation,
as 5:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
Kellie Williams and Chris Williams
Defendant:
HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, a California Corporation,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Taylor Read et al v. Hyundai Motor America et al
as 8:2024cv01123
Plaintiff:
Taylor Read, Kevin Neu and Amit Jain
Defendant:
HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA INC., a California corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Quezada v. Hyundai Motor America
as 8:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Xylon David Quezada
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Richard Martin et al v. Hyundai Motor America
as 2:2024cv02754
Plaintiff:
Richard Martin and Paula Martin
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MUNCK et al v. HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA CORPORATION
as 2:2024cv02596
Plaintiff:
GREGORY MUNCK and TAYLOR MUNCK
Defendant:
HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gregory Munck et al v. Hyundai Motor America
as 8:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
GREGORY MUNCK and TAYLOR MUNCK
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Encinas v. Hyundai Motor America
as 3:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Bianca Aliss Encinas
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America
Makiyah S. Hall v. Hyundai Motor America, Corp.
as 8:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Makiyah S. Hall
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Arceo et al v. Hyundai Motor America
as 3:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Daniel Arceo and Maribel Arceo
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America
Butler v. Hyundai Motor America
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Kory C. Butler
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 231
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
