Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Insight Psychology and Addiction Inc. v. Inpsycht Psychological Services, PC et al
as 8:2022cv01304
Plaintiff:
Insight Psychology and Addiction Inc. doing business as NSIGHT Psychology and Addiction
Defendant:
Inpsycht Psychological Services, PC, Lauren Ashley Shapiro and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127 Trademark Infringement
Brandable Ventures, LLC v. Zyppah, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv08427
Defendant:
Laura Greenburg, Jonathan Greenburg, Always More Marketing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Brandable Ventures, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Ryan Shapiro
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Shapiro v. Cable News Network, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03033
Defendant:
Amy Bucher, Heidi Burke, Cable News Network, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Shapiro
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Elinor Shapiro, et al v. Hasbro, Inc.
as 16-56540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELINOR SHAPIRO
Appellant:
LISA J. BORODKIN, Counsel for Plaintiff and Interested Party
Defendant - Appellee:
HASBRO, INC.
Alexander John Greggs v. Grande Butera et al
as 2:2016cv06320
Defendant:
Apple Inc, Does, Carl Anthony Falk and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander John Greggs
Elinor Shapiro v. Hasbro Inc et al
as 2:2015cv02964
Defendant:
Does and Hasbro Inc
Plaintiff:
Elinor Shapiro
Peter Kredenser v. Jonathan Shapiro et al
as 2:2015cv00843
Defendant:
Does, Jonathan Shapiro and Cheyenne Smith
Plaintiff:
Peter Kredenser
We 3 Kings, Inc. v. The Steve Harvey Show et al
as 2:2014cv08816
Defendant:
Alex Duda, KNBC, WTVR and others
Petitioner:
Michael R Shapiro
Plaintiff:
We 3 Kings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Elinor Shapiro v. Moose Enterprise Pty Limited et al
as 2:2014cv01073
Defendant:
Does and Moose Enterprise Pty Limited
Plaintiff:
Elinor Shapiro
Susan NicholsonHofheinz v. Everett Collection Inc et al
as 2:2012cv09310
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc, CH Artwork, CSS Industries Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Nicholson Hofheinz
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
