Cases 1 - 10 of 36,034
Sanchez v.O'Malley
as 3:2024cv03654
Plaintiff:
Richard M Sanchez
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
(SS) McKinney v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Shawn Kevin McKinney
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Nancy L.C. v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv05142
Plaintiff:
Nancy L. C.
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Christoffers
as 8:2024cv01326
Plaintiff:
Brenna J. Christoffers
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Ducommun v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv05119
Plaintiff:
Michelle Renee Ducommun
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mercado v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv05124
Plaintiff:
Natalie Mercado
Defendant:
Commissioner, Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jollenburg v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv05128
Plaintiff:
Joslyn Coredelia Jollenburg, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Selzer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00479
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas Selzer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Awes-Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00480
Plaintiff:
Brittany Awes-Taylor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Diaz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00481
Plaintiff:
Maria Christina Diaz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
