Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States of America et al v. Jones
as 4:2009cv01730
Petitioner:
United States of America and Karen Sterling
Respondent:
Annie P. Jones
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
United States of America et al v. Ulrich
as 3:2009cv01692
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Karen Sterling
Defendant:
Walter Ulrich
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
United States of America et al v. Mendoza
as 3:2008cv04696
Petitioner:
United States of America, United States of America and Karen Sterling
Respondent:
Beth D. Mendoza
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States of America et al v. Mendoza
as 3:2008cv04695
Petitioner:
United States of America and Karen Sterling
Respondent:
Edmundo T. Mendoza
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Sterling Trading, LLC v. USA, et al
as 08-55735
Petitioner - Appellant:
STERLING TRADING, LLC
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY -- THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cox v. USA et al
as 3:2008cv00077
Plaintiff:
Randy L Cox
Defendant:
USA, Sterling Savings Bank, Potlatch 1 Federal Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Randy L. Cox v. USA et al
as 3:2008cv00077
Defendant:
USA, Sterling Savings Bank, Potlatch 1 Federal Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
United States of America et al v. Silva et al
as 3:2008cv00682
Petitioner:
United States of America and Karen Sterling
Respondent:
Annalisa J. Silva and Daniel A. Silva
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Sterling Trading v USA
as 8:2007cv00915
Petitioner:
Sterling Trading
Respondent:
United States of America and Department of the Treasury -- The Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
