Cases 111 - 120 of 162
Carlie Spiers, et al v. GlaxoSmithKline
as 13-80197
Plaintiff - Respondent:
CARLIE SPIERS, SANDRA WALKER, EVELYN WYATT and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, AKA SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Khan Truong v. USDC-CASD
as 13-72729
:
In re: KHAN CHAN TRUONG
Petitioner:
KHAN CHAN TRUONG
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Khan v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv01173
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Khalid Hasan Khan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mohammed E Hossain v. Abdur Rahman Bishsos et al
as 2:2013cv02732
Defendant:
Golamali Howlader, Husband of Shani, Anis Howlader and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammed E Hossain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Ali Khan
as 13-30068
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALI DWAYNE KHAN
Ghayoor Khan v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-70416
Petitioner:
GHAYOOR KHAN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Muhammad Ashraf, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-73965
Petitioner:
MUHAMMAD ASHRAF, AKA Muhammad Ashraf Khan, NAILA ASHRAF, AKA Naila Gul and MUHAMMAD AWAIS, AKA Muhammad Awais Khan
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Sana Ullah Khan et al
as 8:2012cv01072
Defendant:
Sana Ullah Khan, Accident Help Line Medical Group Inc, Valley Interpreting Services LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
Dentons US LLP
Plaintiff:
State Compensation Insurance Fund
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
USA v. Mumraiz Khan
as 11-10334
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MUMRAIZ KHAN
Mohammed Khan, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-71747
Petitioner:
MOHAMMED KAFIULLAH KHAN, FEROZA KAHN, NAZLI KHAN and others
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
