Cases 161 - 170 of 2,562
State of Hawaii, Department of Human Services, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Hoopono-Services for the Blind v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00310
Plaintiff:
State of Hawaii, Department of Human Services, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Ho'opono - Services for the Blind
Defendant:
United States, United States Department of the Army and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Lendlease (US) Construction Inc. v. China Oceanwide Holdings Limited (OPENED IN ERROR, REFER TO MC 21-00326 DKW-KJM)
as 1:2021cv00360
Plaintiff:
Lendlease (US) Construction Inc.
Defendant:
China Oceanwide Holdings Limited
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00283
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00287
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Schneiter v. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) et al
as 1:2021cv00291
Defendant:
National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and United States Army Claims Service (USARCS)
Plaintiff:
Karl David Schneiter
Hueter et al v. AST Telecomm LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00207
Plaintiff:
Steven Jay Pincus Hueter, Michael S. Kirk, Candyman and others
Defendant:
Fiu J. Saelua, American Samoa Power Authority, Raj Deo and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Jaralba v. Suttell & Hammer, P.S.
as 1:2021cv00256
Defendant:
Suttell & Hammer, P.S.
Plaintiff:
Mary Jane Jaralba
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sakamoto v. Nelson & Kennard, Attorneys at Law
as 1:2021cv00258
Plaintiff:
Wes Sakamoto
Defendant:
Nelson & Kennard, Attorneys at Law
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Grant v. Merit Systems Protection Board
as 1:2021cv00239
Petitioner:
Paul A. Grant
Respondent:
Merit Systems Protection Board
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
