Cases 11 - 20 of 1,395
Jace v. Lirones, et al.
as 24-1742
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JACE
Defendant:
MARGARET LIRONES, Senior Librarian at CSP-Corcoran, KEN CLARK, Warden at CSP-Corcoran and A. PETERSON, Captain 4B Yard at CSP-Corcoran
Hill v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-1583
Petitioner:
NATHAN HILL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
GAVIN NEWSOM, RALPH DIAZ, Director of CDCR, KEN CLARK, Warden of CSP-Corcoran and others
Long v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, et al.
as 24-1557
Plaintiff:
RICHARD D. LONG
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, 3M COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Warren v. City of Henderson, et al.
as 24-1362
Plaintiff:
ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant:
CITY OF HENDERSON, CITY OF HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, HOLLIE CHADWICK, Henderson Police Department Chief of Police and others
Clark v. Rosenblum
as 24-1274
Plaintiff:
IAN LEONARD CLARK
Defendant:
ELLEN ROSENBLUM, Attorney General
Rust v. Fernandez, et al.
as 24-1098
Plaintiff:
CLARK RUST, independently, and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant:
ANTONIO FERNANDEZ, Sgt., ROBERT HOLDEN, C.O., AUBRIE MILLER and others
Ashley v. Moore, et al.
as 24-1109
Plaintiff:
G. ASHLEY
Defendant:
MICHEL REY MOORE, JUSTIN PETERS, Officer, No. 37708, EDGAR MURO, Officer, No. 36863 and others
County of San Diego v. United States District Court for the Southern District of California, San Diego
as 24-894
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Interested Party:
DARRYL DUNSMORE, ANDREE ANDRADE, ERNEST ARCHULETA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
