Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02807
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Salazar v. Cox Communications, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00720
Plaintiff:
Dennis Salazar
Defendant:
Cox Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Rebosa v. Capital One Bank, N.A.
as 2:2017cv00877
Defendant:
Capital One Bank, N.A., Cox Communications, Inc., Discover Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Nicolette L. Rebosa
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02708
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00428
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BMG Rights Management US LLC et al v. Cox Enterprises Inc et al
as 2:2015mc00189
Plaintiff:
BMG Rights Management US LLC and Round Hill Music LP
Defendant:
Cox Communications Inc, Cox Enterprises Inc and CoxCom LLC
Movant:
RightsCorp Inc and Robert Steele
Cox Communications Inc v. Visa Inc et al
as 2:2013cv06604
Plaintiff:
Cox Communications Inc
Defendant:
Does, MasterCard Incorporated, MasterCard International Incorporated and others
Brittni Cottle-Banks v. Cox Communications, Inc., et al
as 13-80136
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
BRITTNI COTTLE-BANKS, an Individual, on behalf of herself and of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Respondent:
COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation and DOES, 1 through 100, inclusive
Lepre v. Cox Communications, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01639
Plaintiff:
George Lepre
Defendant:
Cox Communications, Inc. and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
