Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,266
Zavala Figueroa, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2657
Plaintiff: YOVANA ZAVALA FIGUEROA and SERGIO SALDANA GOMEZ
Defendant: LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Gomez Trejo v. Garland
as 24-2457
Petitioner: RAFAEL GOMEZ TREJO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
(PS) Jacobs et al v. The Trustees of Princeton University et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01143
Plaintiff: Joel Brendon Jacobs and Kathleen Chambers
Defendant: The Trustees of Princeton University, Princeton University Investment Co., Christopher Eisgruber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gomez-Menjivar v. Garland
as 24-2301
Petitioner: KEDUIN ANTONIO GOMEZ-MENJIVAR
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gomez v. Garland
as 24-2235
Petitioner: PEDRO GOMEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gomez-Perez v. Garland
as 24-2183
Petitioner: IRIS ANABELY GOMEZ-PEREZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chavez v. Gomez, et al.
as 24-2108
Plaintiff: JUAN PADRONE CHAVEZ
Defendant: JIMMY GOMEZ, U.S. House of Representatives, DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM, CITY OF LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, Communications (c/o Mendoza 41366) and others
Eyad Karzoun v. Luna Innovations Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv02630
Plaintiff: Eyad Karzoun
Defendant: Luna Innovations Incorporated, Scott A. Graeff, Eugene J. Nestro and others
Gomez v. Garland
as 24-1857
Petitioner: MAXIMINO GOMEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hill v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-1583
Petitioner: NATHAN HILL
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party: GAVIN NEWSOM, RALPH DIAZ, Director of CDCR, KEN CLARK, Warden of CSP-Corcoran and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?