Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Cox vs. Randazza, et al.,
as 2:2013cv00297
Defendant:
AOL Inc., APPLE, David S. Aman, OR and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal L Cox
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MircoUnity Systems Engineering, Inc. et al v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 5:2013mc80020
Plaintiff:
MircoUnity Systems Engineering, Inc.
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC and others
Objector:
Adobe Systems, Inc.
Motorola Mobility, Inc. et al v. TiVo Inc.
as 3:2013mc80016
Plaintiff:
Motorola Mobility, Inc. and General Instrument Corp.
Defendant:
TiVo Inc.
Motorola Mobility, Inc. et al v. TiVo Inc.
as 5:2013mc80015
Plaintiff:
Motorola Mobility, Inc. and General Instrument Corporation
Defendant:
TiVo Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Google Inc.
Motorola Mobility LLC
as 3:2012cv02618
Plaintiff:
Motorola Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
In re: Ex Parte Application Motorola Mobility LLC
as 5:2012mc80243
Movant:
In Re Ex Parte Application of Motorola Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Pacilli et al v. Carrier IQ Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02137
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Pacilli , Saima Mian , Amandeep Singh and others
Defendant:
Carrier IQ, Inc, AT & T Inc., Sprint Nextel Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cascades Computer Innovation LLC v. RPX Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv01143
Plaintiff:
Cascades Computer Innovation LLC
Defendant:
RPX Corporation , LG Electronics, Inc, HTC Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Cascades Computer Innovation LLC v. RPX Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv01143
Plaintiff:
Cascades Computer Innovation LLC
Defendant:
RPX Corporation, LG Electronics, Inc, HTC Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
In re Ex Parte Application of Apple, Inc., et al
as 3:2012cv00179
Plaintiff:
Apple Inc.
Respondent:
Motorola Mobility, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
