Cases 11 - 20 of 201
United States of America v. Murillo-Portales
as 23-307
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellant:
OSCAR MURILLO-PORTALES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Murillo-Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1558
Petitioner:
KATHERINE LIZETH MURILLO-MARTINEZ and JEFFERSON ALEXIS LOPEZ-MURILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gonzalez Murillo v. Garland
as 22-1217
Petitioner:
JOSE GUSTAVO GONZALEZ MURILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Murillo v. United States of America
as 22-458
Petitioner:
SANTOS PETER MURILLO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cindy Alegre, et al v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 22-55070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CINDY ALEGRE, FRANK ALEGRE, MICHAEL ALEGRE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SALLY JEWELL, Secretary of the Department of Interior, United States of America, in her official capacity, LAWRENCE ROBERTS, Assistant Secretary of the Department of Interior - Indian Affairs, United States of America, in his official capacity, MICHAEL BLACK, Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs of Department of Interior - United States of America, in his official capacity and others
Bautista-Velasco v. Garland
as 21-1324
Petitioner:
DARWIN BAUTISTA-VELASCO and MARICRIS BADAJOS-MURILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
