Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 980
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00887
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1679 Violation of Credit Repair Organizations Act
Cheairs v. City of Seattle, et al.
as 24-3163
Plaintiff: TAYLOR CHEAIRS
Defendant: CITY OF SEATTLE, and its officers, employees and agents, CITY OF SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, and its officers, employees and agents and JOHN DOES, 1-10, unidentified members of the Seattle Police Department
Barlow v. Town of Colorado City
as 24-3118
Plaintiff: TAYLOR E. BARLOW
Defendant: TOWN OF COLORADO CITY, an Arizona Municipal Corporation
Taylor v. Thornell, et al.
as 24-3114
Petitioner: CAMERON LEEZELL TAYLOR
Respondent: RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, KRIS MAYES, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, DAVID SHINN, ADOC Director and others
Rico v. Ducart, et al.
as 24-3038
Plaintiff: JORGE ANDRADE RICO
Defendant: CLARK E. DUCART, JIM ROBERTSON, D BRADBURY and others
Taylor v. Gordan, et al.
as 24-3049
Plaintiff: ARTHUR TAYLOR
Defendant: GORDAN, C/O- Retaliation, D. ECUENA, Warden (A), KANCTLL, Lieutenant and others
Taylor v. County of Washington, et al.
as 24-2998
Plaintiff: JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR
Defendant: COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, Sheriff LOPEZ, ALLISON BROWN and others
Taylor v. State of Oregon, et al.
as 24-3003
Plaintiff: JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR
Defendant: STATE OF OREGON and ROBERT D. JONES, (34176)
Taylor v. Biden, et al.
as 24-3012
Plaintiff: JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR
Defendant: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, DEMOCRATIC PARTY and OREGON DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Taylor v. Independent Firm of Consulting Engineers and Technicians, et al.
as 24-3018
Plaintiff: JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR
Defendant: INDEPENDENT FIRM OF CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND TECHNICIANS, E.O.C.I. and ZULETA, Chaplain

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?