Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,329
Torres, et al. v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Riverside
as 24-3164
Petitioner: DOROTHY TORRES, LUIS TORRES and Dotty Torres
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
Interested Party: JAYCO, INC.
Flickinger v. Castillo et al
as 5:2024cv02915
Plaintiff: Jason Archie Flickinger
Defendant: Jaqueline Reyes Castillo, Robert Crisp, Pedro Quintero and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Barren v. The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections, et al.
as 24-2896
Plaintiff: DONALD ROBIN BARREN
Defendant: THE STATE OF NEVADA EX REL. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TOM LAWSON, P. JORDAN and others
Torres Vargas v. Garland
as 24-2840
Petitioner: OMAR TORRES VARGAS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sanchez Chavez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2770
Petitioner: CARLOS SANCHEZ CHAVEZ, BRISEIDA KRISTELLE LOPEZ DE LA TORRE, CARLOS EMMANUEL SANCHEZ LOPEZ and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sophia De La Torre v. Allied Collection Services of California, LLC
as 2:2024cv03234
Plaintiff: Sophia De La Torre
Defendant: Allied Collection Services of California, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Reyes-Torres v. Garland
as 24-2472
Petitioner: JOSE RAMON REYES-TORRES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
v. Naturalization Ceremony 04/23/2024
as 3:2024mc80088
Not Yet Classified: Adriana Denisse Aguirre, Ali Marzoughi, Jonathan Galvez and others
Perez Torres v. Garland
as 24-2158
Petitioner: DANIEL ENRIQUE PEREZ TORRES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Torres, et al. v. Jayco, Inc.
as 24-2164
Plaintiff: DOROTHY TORRES, LUIS TORRES and Dotty Torres
Defendant: JAYCO, INC., an Indiana Corporation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?