Cases 11 - 18 of 18
TML Recovery, LLC v. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, et al
as 8:2019cv02083
Defendant:
HEALTHCARE INSURANCE, OPTUMINSIGHT, INC, VIANT, INC., and others
Plaintiff:
TML Recovery, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
MMR Services, LLC v. Unitedhealth Group, Inc., et al
as 8:2019cv02082
Defendant:
UHC OF CALIFORNIA, UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC.,, UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLC, and others
Plaintiff:
MMR SERVICES, LLC, and MMR Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Womans Recovery Center, LLC v. UnitedHealth Group Inc., et al
as 8:2019cv02084
Plaintiff:
WOMANS RECOVERY CENTER, LLC
Defendant:
OPTUM SERVICES INC., UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC.,, UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
John Meyer v. United Healthcare
as 19-35641
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN PHILIP MEYER
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED HEALTHCARE, Insurance Company
Smith v. United Healthcare Insurance Company et al
as 4:2018cv06336
Defendant:
United Healthcare Insurance Company and United Behavioral Health
Plaintiff:
Jane Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
David Trujillo, et al v. UnitedHealth Group Inc., et al
as 5:2017cv02547
Plaintiff:
Deanna Harden and David Trujillo
Defendant:
United HealthCare Services, Inc.,, mn, United Healthcare Insurance Company and UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
United States of America et al v. Scan Health Plan et al
as 2:2009cv05013
Defendant:
Aetna, Health Net, Healthcare Partners and others
Plaintiff:
State of California, James M. Swoben and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
USA, et al v. United Healthcare Insurance Co, et al
as 13-56746
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. SWOBEN, Qui Tam Relator
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation, UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., Minnesota corporation, UHIC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
