Cases 11 - 20 of 742
State of California et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2022cv02583
Plaintiff:
State of California, State of New York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Louis DeJoy
Intervenor Defendant:
Oshkosh Defense, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Binesh v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2022cv01138
Plaintiff:
Faz Binesh
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
George Austin v. USPS
as 21-17021
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, Esq.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Timothy Petrozzi v. Jay Inslee, et al
as 21-35882
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY R. PETROZZI
Defendant / Appellee:
JAY ROBERT INSLEE, Governor, BOB FERGUSON, RONALD B. LEIGHTON, Judge and others
Crystal Nasha Rodgers v. Louis DeJoy et al
as 2:2021cv08190
Plaintiff:
Crystal Nasha Rodgers
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Mohamed Abdelkadir v. USPS, et al
as 21-35843
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOHAMED ABDELKADIR
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, C.J. MARLEY, Tort Claims Supervisor and TERRELL T. CARRINGTON
Arturo Valencia Barrera v. USPS
as 21-56019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTURO OSIEL VALENCIA BARRERA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Advantage Mailing, Inc. v. United States Postal Service
as 8:2021cv00972
Plaintiff:
Advantage Mailing, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Timothy Petrozzi v. Jay Inslee, et al
as 21-35403
Defendant / Appellee:
PAEZ, Honorable, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, STANLEY J. RUMBAUGH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY R. PETROZZI
Austin v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2021cv03108
Plaintiff:
George Jarvis Austin
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
