Cases 21 - 26 of 26
AECOM Technology Corporation, et al v. OWCP, et al
as 11-73485
Petitioner:
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS and BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD
California Shock Trauma Air Re v. State Compensation Insurance F, et al
as 09-16810
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC., CITY OF WATSONVILLE, LAKE VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALIFORNIA SHOCK TRAUMA AIR RESCUE
AMCAL General Contractors, Inc. v. ACE American Insurance Company et al
as 2:2009cv06134
Plaintiff:
AMCAL General Contractors, Inc. and AMCAL General Contractors, Inc.
Defendant:
ACE American Insurance Company, ACE USA and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract
California Shock Trauma Air Re v. State Compensation Insurance F, et al
as 09-16810
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALIFORNIA SHOCK TRAUMA AIR RESCUE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY and others
CALIFORNIA SHOCK TRAUMA AIR RESCUE
as 2:2009at00048
Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA SHOCK TRAUMA AIR RESCUE
Defendant:
State Compensation Insurance Fund, ESIS, INC., Zurich American Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In Re the Complaint of William Groomes
as 3:2007cv00559
Claimant:
Marriott International, Inc., Ace American Insurance Company, Insurance Company of North America and others
Counter Claimant:
The Standard Fire Insurance Company
ThirdParty Defendant:
Michael Broemer, Continental Yachts, Tom Fulkerson and others
Cross Defendant:
William Groomes and Tom Folkesson
Counter Defendant:
Michael Broemer, Continental Yachts, Tom Fulkerson and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Ace American Insurance Company and Insurance Company of North America
Cross Claimant:
Michael Broemer and Continental Yachts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
