Cases 21 - 30 of 2,481
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Tian v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 2:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Gengcai Tian
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Gengcai Tian v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
Gengcai Tian
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,, Bank of America, N.A. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Harrison v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Ganga Harrison
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Hart v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., et al.
as 24-36
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GUY HART, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and DOES, 1 to 50
White v. Anywhere Real Estate Inc., et al.
as 23-4378
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS PHIPPS WHITE, a California Resident
Defendant / Appellee:
ANYWHERE REAL ESTATE INC., parent company of West Coast Escrow Company a domestic corporation, BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. and others
Michael Steele v. Bank of America, National Association
as 5:2023cv02571
Plaintiff:
Michael Steele
Defendant:
Bank of America, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas et al
as 2:2023cv10203
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Marth Enriquez, Jules Arthur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Medina v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2023cv02207
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Medina
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
