Cases 21 - 30 of 1,368
DePetro, et al. v. Minev, et al.
as 24-1288
Plaintiff:
FRANK DEPETRO
Defendant:
MICHAEL MINEV, HDSP MEDICAL NURSING STAFF, DENNIS TAMBAN, Last name added by SAC, ECF No. 21 formerly known as Dennis and others
Flannery v. Snowflake Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv01234
Plaintiff:
Suzanne L. Flannery
Defendant:
Snowflake Inc., Frank Slootman and Michael P. Scarpelli
Porras Atao, et al. v. Garland
as 24-926
Petitioner:
ALICIA GERTRUDES PORRAS ATAO and FRANK MAYTA PORRAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Stephens v. Maplebear Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Andy Dean Stephens
Defendant:
Maplebear Inc. d/b/a Instacart, Fidji Simo, Nick Giovanni and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Alex Knowles et al v. Taylor Woods et al
as 2:2024cv00675
Defendant:
Howard Wu, Taylor Woods, Howard Chorng Jeng Wu and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Knowles, A Way To Move, Inc., John Bidart and others
Caraffa v. Moyer, et al.
as 24-417
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Defendant / Appellee:
M. MOYER, correctional officer, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS REHABILITATION AND REENTRY, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Saintillus v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-402
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHALONER SAINTILLUS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PHILLIP A. TALBERT, GRANT RABENN and others
In Re Jack Richard Finnegan
as 8:2024cv00038
Debtor:
Jack Richard Finnegan
Defendant:
United States Agencies Officer, Peter C. Anderson, Frank C. Cadigan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679 Violation of Credit Repair Organizations Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
