Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,166
Gilda Marroouin-Diaz v. Michael Mukasey
as 08-74799
Petitioner: GILDA ISELA MARROOUIN-DIAZ
Respondent: MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Samvel Hakobyan v. Michael Mukasey et al
as 2:2008cv07620
Plaintiff: Samvel Hakobyan
Defendant: Michael B. Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rigoberto Rios Martinez, et al v. Michael Mukasey
as 08-74705
Petitioner: RIGOBERTO RIOS MARTINEZ and MARIA GUADALUPE CASILLAS
Respondent: MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Mohamed Bernaz v. Michael Chertoff et al
as 8:2008cv01302
Plaintiff: Mohamed Abdurrazag Bernaz and Mohamed Abdurrazag Bernaz
Defendant: Michael Chertoff, Michael B Mukasey, Emilio T Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Application for Naturalization Hearing
Javier Chaves Torres, et al v. Michael Mukasey
as 08-74664
Petitioner: JAVIER CHAVES TORRES and ERNESTINA AYALA GOMEZ
Respondent: MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Pablo Pinto Alvizar v. Michael Mukasey
as 08-74660
Petitioner: PABLO ALFONSO PINTO ALVIZAR
Respondent: MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Roberto Silva-Pereira v. Michael Mukasey
as 08-74665
Petitioner: ROBERTO CARLOS SILVA-PEREIRA
Respondent: MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Singh et al v. Roark et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv02734
Plaintiff: Hardip Singh, Harkamal Singh and Sukhjeet Kaur
Defendant: David Roark, F. Gerard Heinauer, Jonathan Scharfen and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Other Statutes None
Moses Gakuru v. Michael Mukasey
as 08-74640
Petitioner: MOSES NGIGI GAKURU
Respondent: MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
David Yenktesh v. Michael Mukasey
as 08-74627
Petitioner: DAVID JOSEPH YENKTESH
Respondent: MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?