Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Josh Crystal v. Medbox, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00426
Plaintiff:
Josh Crystal and Mike Jones
Defendant:
Medbox, Inc, Medbox, Inc., Pejman Vincent Mehdizadeh and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Peter Phan, Paul Poon, Ervin Gutierrez and others
Petitioner:
Hugo Colindres, Nancy Fox, Michael Konar and others
Ned Flores v. Adir International, LLC
as 2:2015cv00076
Defendant:
Adir International, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ned Flores
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2003cv01676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
In re: Chinacast Educ. Corp. Sec. Lit
as 12-57232
:
In re: CHINACAST EDUCATION CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COSTA BRAVA PARTNERSHIP III LP, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated and JAYHAWK PRIVATE EQUITY FUND II LP
Defendant - Appellee:
CHINACAST EDUCATION CORPORATION, NED SHERWOOD, STEPHEN MARKSCHEID and others
USA v. Ned Roscoe
as 12-10335
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NED ROSCOE
USA v. Ned Roscoe
as 12-10108
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NED ROSCOE
USA v. Andre Ned
as 11-10305
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDRE NED
USA v. Andre Ned
as 11-10286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDRE NED
Kirschenman Enterprises Sales LP et al v. Anshin Produce Co Inc et al
as 8:2010cv01229
Defendant:
Anshin Produce Co Inc, Andy Ortiz, Dennis Ortiz and others
Plaintiff:
Davalan Sales Inc, GD Fresh Distribution Inc, JHP Produce Inc and others
Ned's House of Produce v. Direct Fresh Produce, Inc et al
as 3:2009cv00863
Plaintiff:
Ned's House of Produce
Defendant:
Direct Fresh Produce, Inc, Alex Garcia, Gisel Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
