Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 180
Marciala Salgado Rabadan, et al v. William Barr
as 20-71737
Petitioner: MARCIALA SALGADO RABADAN, ARMANDO NAVA SALGADO, ALFREDO NAVA SALGADO and others
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05229
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
USA v. Israel Nava-Arellano We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-50151
Defendant / Appellant: ISRAEL NAVA-ARELLANO
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Israel Nava-Arellano
as 20-55446
Defendant / Appellant: ISRAEL NAVA-ARELLANO
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Moises Nava Olivares v. William Barr
as 20-71011
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner: MOISES NOBA NAVA OLIVARES
Nicole Ann Penaloza et al v. City of Anaheim et al
as 8:2020mc00007
Claimant: Nicole Penaloza, Jessica Figueroa, J.P. and others
Defendant: Kevin Pedersen, City of Anaheim and Sean Staymates
Rodrigo Diaz-Nava v. William Barr
as 20-70414
Petitioner: RODRIGO NOEL DIAZ-NAVA, AKA Jose Luna-Nava
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Kris De Nava v. Teamsters Union Local 166, et al
as 19-56411
Plaintiff / Appellee: KRIS DE NAVA, an individual
Defendant: COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, FKA Costco Wholesale Membership, Inc. and DOES, 1-50, inclusive
Defendant / Appellant: TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 166, a California unincorporated association
Mario Ramos-Navas v. William Barr We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-72985
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner: MARIO DUSSTIN RAMOS-NAVAS
Felipe Juarez v. William Barr
as 19-72729
Petitioner: FELIPE JR. JUAREZ, AKA Felipe Juarez, AKA Felipe Juarez Nava
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?