Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 140
State of Arizona v. Janet Yellen, et al
as 21-16227
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF ARIZONA
Defendant / Appellee: JANET YELLEN, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury, RICHARD K. DELMAR, in his official capacity as acting inspector general of the Department of Treasury and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Amicus Curiae: GOLDWATER INSTITUTE, STATE OF OHIO, ALASKA, ARKANSAS, FLORIDA, IDAHO, IOWA, KANSAS, KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MISSISSIPPI, MONTANA, NEBRASKA, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NORTH DAKOTA, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, SOUTH DAKOTA, TENNESSEE, TEXAS, UTAH, and WEST VIRGINIA, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Brenda Nordenstrom v. Ricky Paurus, et al
as 21-35572
Plaintiff / Appellee: BRENDA KAY NORDENSTROM, individually, and as personal representative for the Estate of Bryan Perry, Deceased
Defendant / Appellant: RICKY PAURUS, an individual, LACEY SANDQUIST, an individual and MATRONA SHADRIN, an individual
Defendant: CORIZON HEALTH, INC., a Tennessee Corporation, COUNTY OF CLACKAMAS, an Oregon county, JANA RACKLEY, an individual and others
State of Utah et al v. Google LLC et al
as 3:2021cv05227
Plaintiff: State of Utah, State of New York, State of North Carolina and others
Defendant: Google LLC, Google Ireland Limited, Google Commercial Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Vancouver Clinic Inc., PS, et al v. Affiliated FM Insurance Co.
as 21-35499
Plaintiff: DOSSIER F&B, LLC, DELUXE RESTAURANT, LLC, THEODORE F&B, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: VANCOUVER CLINIC INC., PS
Defendant / Appellee: AFFILIATED FM INSURANCE COMPANY
Aspen Lodging Group, LLC, et al v. Affiliated FM Insurance Co.
as 21-35472
Plaintiff / Appellant: ASPEN LODGING GROUP, LLC, VILLA PALM SPRINGS OWNER, LLC, ROOSEVELT HOTEL OWNER, LLC and others
Plaintiff: VANCOUVER CLINIC INC., PS
Defendant / Appellee: AFFILIATED FM INSURANCE COMPANY
United States of America et al v. McKesson Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021mc80065
Plaintiff: Tennessee, New York, State of, State of Nevada and others
Defendant: McKesson Corporation and Oncology Therapeutics Network Corporation
3Rd Party Defendant: Office of the A California State Board of Pharmacy
Zachary Silbersher, et al v. Allergan, Inc., et al
as 21-15420
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant / Appellant: ALLERGAN USA, INC., ALLERGAN SALES, LLC, ADAMAS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Zachary Silbersher, et al v. Allergan, Inc., et al
as 21-80005
Respondent: STATE OF HAWAII, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF IOWA and others
Petitioner: ALLERGAN SALES, LLC, ALLERGAN USA, INC., ALLERGAN, INC. and others
Cassandra Charles v. U.S. Office of Personnel Manag, et al
as 21-15222
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, U.S. Army Medical Command, USA MEDDIC Bavaria, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION HCS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CASSANDRA B. CHARLES and CASSANDRA BONITA CHARLES
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant: Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff: Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant: Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court: Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae: American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant: Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party: Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner: Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?