Cases 31 - 40 of 2,335
Marquardt-Stoneking v. O'Malley
as 24-3033
Plaintiff:
ESTHER ELIZABETH MARQUARDT-STONEKING
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Velazquez v. O'Malley
as 24-3034
Plaintiff:
JACOB I. VELAZQUEZ
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 24-3006
Plaintiff:
IVY JOHNSON
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Barrenechea et al
as 5:2024cv02779
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
David Emil Barrenechea individually and doing business as Fuego Grill & Sports Bar, Claudia Patricia Barrenechea individually and doing business as Fuego Grill & Sports Bar, Martin Barrenechea individually and doing business as Fuego Grill & Sports Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Allen v. O'Malley
as 24-2927
Plaintiff:
SUSAN E. ALLEN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Dodge v. O'Malley
as 24-2899
Plaintiff:
ERICA LYNNE DODGE
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Mcclune v. O'Malley
as 24-2911
Plaintiff:
MARTHA MCCLUNE
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Vanness, et al. v. Aguilar, et al.
as 24-2910
Plaintiff:
SUSAN VANNESS, ALEXANDREA SLACK, MARTIN WALDMAN and others
Defendant:
FRANCISCO V. AGUILAR, in his official capacity as Nevada Secretary of State and JOSEPH LOMBARDO, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Nevadaa
Beatty v. O'Malley
as 24-2882
Plaintiff:
KRAIG O. BEATTY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Dominguez v. Lowe's Companies Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
Martin Dominguez
Defendant:
Lowe's Companies Incorporated and Salesforce Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
